Legal Representation
Attorney
Richard P. Georget, Esq.
USPTO Deadlines
Application History
36 eventsDate | Code | Type | Description | Documents |
---|---|---|---|---|
Aug 13, 2023 | DENA | E | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | Loading... |
Aug 12, 2023 | DETH | P | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | Loading... |
Feb 25, 2022 | NREP | P | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | Loading... |
Feb 4, 2022 | NREP | P | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | Loading... |
Nov 16, 2020 | LIMN | I | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | Loading... |
May 22, 2020 | LIMG | M | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | Loading... |
Jan 8, 2016 | FINT | P | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | Loading... |
Dec 18, 2015 | FICS | P | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | Loading... |
Dec 18, 2015 | FICR | P | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | Loading... |
Dec 18, 2014 | ABN2 | O | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | Loading... |
Dec 18, 2014 | MAB2 | O | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | Loading... |
Dec 5, 2014 | OPNX | P | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | Loading... |
Nov 19, 2014 | OPNR | P | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | Loading... |
Nov 19, 2014 | OPNS | P | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | Loading... |
May 14, 2014 | GNFR | O | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | Loading... |
May 14, 2014 | GNFN | O | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | Loading... |
May 14, 2014 | CNFR | R | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | Loading... |
Mar 24, 2014 | NREV | E | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | Loading... |
Mar 24, 2014 | TEME | I | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | Loading... |
Mar 23, 2014 | PROA | I | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | Loading... |
Mar 23, 2014 | CRFA | I | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | Loading... |
Mar 23, 2014 | PETG | O | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | Loading... |
Mar 23, 2014 | TROA | I | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | Loading... |
Jan 23, 2014 | ABN2 | O | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | Loading... |
Jan 23, 2014 | MAB2 | O | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | Loading... |
Sep 5, 2013 | REAP | I | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | Loading... |
Sep 5, 2013 | ARAA | I | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | Loading... |
Jul 7, 2013 | RFNT | P | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | Loading... |
Jun 19, 2013 | RFRR | P | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | Loading... |
Jun 19, 2013 | RFCS | P | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | Loading... |
Jun 19, 2013 | RFCR | E | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | Loading... |
Jun 18, 2013 | MAFR | O | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | Loading... |
Jun 18, 2013 | CNRT | R | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | Loading... |
Jun 14, 2013 | DOCK | D | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | Loading... |
Jun 14, 2013 | NWOS | I | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | Loading... |
Jun 13, 2013 | REPR | M | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | Loading... |
Additional Information
Design Mark
The present mark is a position mark; the mark is arranged on a flat specimen, selected from the claimed goods in the classes 9 and 16, which comprises essentially two main surfaces being parallel to each other and one lateral surface connecting these base surfaces; the ratio of the total of the base surfaces to the lateral surface is preferably > 5, in particular > 10, most preferably > 100- the mark is formed by a strip of constant width and uniform color (including black, white and grey) which contrasts to the lateral surface and is arranged within the lateral surface and preferably circumferential in the lateral surface; the color of the strip contrasts preferably also to the color of the base surfaces; the ratio of the width of the strip to the height of the lateral surface is preferably 1:2 to 1:10, in particular 1:2 to 1:5; the dotted lines in the representation of the mark are not part of the mark and are intended to show the position of the mark on the goods only; the form of a card in the id 1 format represented by the dotted line is merely exemplary and does not intend a limitation of the scope of protection of the mark to ID 1 cards.
Color Claim
Color is not claimed as a feature of the mark.