Legal Representation
Attorney
Kenneth Solomon
USPTO Deadlines
Application History
9 events| Date | Code | Type | Description | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 2008 | TCCA | I | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | Loading... |
| Jan 18, 2008 | MAB2 | O | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | Loading... |
| Jan 18, 2008 | ABN2 | O | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | Loading... |
| Jun 22, 2007 | GNRN | O | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | Loading... |
| Jun 22, 2007 | GNRT | F | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | Loading... |
| Jun 22, 2007 | CNRT | R | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | Loading... |
| Jun 7, 2007 | DOCK | D | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | Loading... |
| Feb 28, 2007 | MDSC | O | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | Loading... |
| Feb 27, 2007 | NWAP | I | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | Loading... |
Detailed Classifications
Class 025
footwear
First Use Anywhere:
Dec 31, 1959
First Use in Commerce:
Dec 31, 1959
Additional Information
Design Mark
The mark consists of two circular, metal eyelets and a pair of generally parallel stripes on a shoe, the eyelets being located above the stripes. The broken lines indicate placement of the mark on the goods and do not form a part of the mark. The broken line located between the generally parallel stripes indicate the top of a band that may be present as foxing on the shoe.
Color Claim
Color is not claimed as a feature of the mark.
Classification
International Classes
025