Legal Representation
Attorney
JOHN M. MCCORMACK
USPTO Deadlines
Application History
10 events| Date | Code | Type | Description | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 27, 1996 | EXPT | T | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | Loading... |
| Aug 26, 1996 | EXFB | T | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | Loading... |
| Aug 26, 1996 | ABN3 | O | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | Loading... |
| Jun 15, 1995 | EXPI | T | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | Loading... |
| Oct 27, 1994 | CNFR | O | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | Loading... |
| Aug 22, 1994 | CRFA | I | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | Loading... |
| Feb 18, 1994 | CNRT | F | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | Loading... |
| Sep 20, 1993 | CRFA | I | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | Loading... |
| Mar 12, 1993 | CNRT | F | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | Loading... |
| Feb 26, 1993 | DOCK | D | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | Loading... |
Additional Information
Design Mark
The mark consists of a substantially flat surface area on the top of a vehicular fender flare, with a long curved outer edge extending along the length of the flat surface. The unbroken lines in the drawing represent mere shading and are not a feature of the mark. The broken lines in the drawing represent features of the goods which are not claimed as features of the mark, and serve only to show the position of the mark on the goods.