Legal Representation
Attorney
KATHY A. HACKMANN
USPTO Deadlines
Next Deadline
1429 days remaining
Section 8 & 9 (40-Year) Renewal Due (Based on registration date 1989-07-04)
Due Date
July 04, 2029
Grace Period Ends
January 04, 2030
Application History
17 eventsDate | Code | Type | Description | Documents |
---|---|---|---|---|
Feb 6, 2010 | CAEX | O | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | Loading... |
Dec 10, 2008 | ASGN | I | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | Loading... |
Aug 27, 2008 | CFIT | O | CASE FILE IN TICRS | Loading... |
Feb 13, 2008 | ASGN | I | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | Loading... |
Jul 19, 2006 | ASGN | I | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | Loading... |
Aug 8, 1996 | A7OK | O | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | Loading... |
Jun 6, 1996 | AMD7 | I | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | Loading... |
Apr 29, 1996 | 8.OK | O | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | Loading... |
Jun 6, 1995 | 8.AF | I | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | Loading... |
Jul 4, 1989 | R.PR | A | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Loading... |
Apr 4, 1989 | PUBO | A | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Loading... |
Mar 4, 1989 | NPUB | O | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | Loading... |
Dec 2, 1988 | DOCK | D | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | Loading... |
Dec 2, 1988 | CNSA | O | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Loading... |
Oct 12, 1988 | CRFA | I | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | Loading... |
Aug 10, 1988 | CNRT | F | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | Loading... |
Jul 18, 1988 | DOCK | D | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | Loading... |
Additional Information
Other
IN THE STATEMENT, COLUMN 1, LINES 6 THROUGH 9, "FACSIMILE MACHINES AND PAGERS; AND COMPUTER PROGRAMS DEALING TELECOMMUNICATIONS" IS DELETED. IN THE STATEMENT, COLUMN 1, LINE 16, "AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE MANUALS" IS DELETED. IN THE STATEMENT, PAGE 2, COLUMN 1, LINES 6 THROUGH 7, "RETAIL COMPUTER STORE SERVICES" IS DELETED.
Other
FIRST USED IN ANOTHER FORM ON 1889
Other
FIRST USED IN COMMERCE IN ANOTHER FORM ON 1889
Other
FIRST USED IN ANOTHER FORM ON 1889
Other
FIRST USED IN COMMERCE IN ANOTHER FORM ON 1889
Other
FIRST USED IN ANOTHER FORM ON 1889
Other
FIRST USED IN COMMERCE IN ANOTHER FORM ON 1889
Other
FIRST USED IN ANOTHER FORM ON 1889
Other
FIRST USED IN COMMERCE IN ANOTHER FORM ON 1889
Other
FIRST USED IN ANOTHER FORM ON 1889
Other
FIRST USED IN COMMERCE IN ANOTHER FORM ON 1889
Other
FIRST USED IN ANOTHER FORM ON 1889
Other
FIRST USED IN COMMERCE IN ANOTHER FORM ON 1889
Other
THIS IS A CONCURRENT REGISTRATION ISSUED PURSUANT TO THE OPINIONS OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN UNITED STATES V. WESTERN ELECTRIC CO., INC., CIVIL ACTION NO. 82-0192, DATED JULY 8, 1983, AND FEBRUARY 6, 1984, AND SECTIONS 2(D) AND 37 OF THE LANHAM ACT, 15 U.S.C. SECTIONS 1052(D) AND 1119. REGISTRATION IS NATIONWIDE, BUT IS SUBJECT TO THE CONDITION THAT REGISTRANT SHALL USE THE MARK ONLY IN CONJUNCTION WITH ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING MODIFIERS; "NEVADA BELL", "PACIFIC BELL", "PACIFIC TELEPHONE", "PACIFIC TELESIS", "PACTEL". USE OF A MODIFIER SHALL BE CONSIDERED TO BE IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE MARK IF IT IS USED IN SUFFICIENT PROXIMITY TO THE MARK SUCH THAT A REASONABLE OBSERVER WOULD NORMALLY VIEW THE MARK AND THE MODIFIER IN A SINGLE VISUAL IMPRESSION AND WOULD RECOGNIZE THAT BOTH THE MARK AND THE MODIFIER ARE USED BY REGISTRANT. REGISTRANT'S RIGHT TO EXCLUSIVE USE OF THE MARK IS SUBJECT TO THE RIGHTS OF THE FOLLOWING COMPANIES, TO WHICH CONCURRENT REGISTRATIONS IN THE MARK HAVE ALSO BEEN ISSUED, TO USE THE MARK IN CONJUNCTION WITH ONE OR MORE OF THE MODIFIERS SPECIFIED IN THOSE REGISTRATIONS; AMERICAN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION; BELL ATLANTIC CORPORATION; BELLSOUTH CORPORATION; CINCINNATI BELL INC.; NYNEX CORPORATION; PACIFIC TELESIS GROUP; THE SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND TELEPHONE COMPANY; SOUTHWESTERN BELL CORPORATION; AND U S WEST, INC.