Legal Representation
Attorney
DAVID C. WEST, ESQ.
USPTO Deadlines
Next Deadline
1965 days remaining
Section 8 & 9 (50-Year) Renewal Due (Based on registration date 1980-12-16)
Due Date
December 16, 2030
Grace Period Ends
June 16, 2031
Application History
19 events| Date | Code | Type | Description | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2016 | CAEX | O | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | Loading... |
| Sep 30, 2009 | CORV | P | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | Loading... |
| Feb 14, 2008 | CFIT | O | CASE FILE IN TICRS | Loading... |
| Feb 28, 2007 | ASCK | I | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | Loading... |
| Feb 14, 2007 | ASCK | I | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | Loading... |
| Jan 24, 2007 | ASCK | I | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | Loading... |
| Nov 8, 2006 | ASCK | I | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | Loading... |
| Nov 18, 2005 | TCCA | I | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | Loading... |
| Jan 18, 2005 | I | PAPER RECEIVED | Loading... | |
| Oct 10, 2002 | TCCA | I | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | Loading... |
| Jun 7, 2002 | 89AG | O | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | Loading... |
| Jun 7, 2002 | RNL1 | Q | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | Loading... |
| Mar 25, 2002 | I | PAPER RECEIVED | Loading... | |
| Mar 25, 2002 | PR89 | I | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 8 & 9 | Loading... |
| Sep 24, 2001 | PR89 | O | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | Loading... |
| Jun 21, 2001 | 89AF | I | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | Loading... |
| Oct 8, 1986 | C15A | O | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | Loading... |
| Jul 1, 1986 | 815F | I | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | Loading... |
| Dec 16, 1980 | R.PR | A | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Loading... |
Additional Information
Other
APPLICANT HEREBY DISCLAIMS THE WORD "POWER" SEPARATE AND APART FROM THE COMPOSITE MARK AS SHOWN BUT WAIVES NONE OF ITS COMMON LAW RIGHTS TO THE MARK AS A WHOLE.